Categories
In the fast and furious business world the emphasis is always upon the need to get the deal done and as quickly as possible. Often it is only much later after the transaction is completed that questions are thrown up as to whether a contract was made and if so upon what terms? Lawyers are then engaged many months or years later in order to examine the communications that took place at the time when the deal was made to answer these questions. T he widespread use of e mails and the internet has led to the increased need for lawyers to unpick these communications to establish whether a contract has been made or not, and if so upon what terms, where a signed contract does not exist. A dispute may arise over the existence and terms of the contract and the court is asked to unravel what happened at ...
This is the second part of my discussion on the consequences of not having a written and signed contract in place. A s can be seen from the cases described in this article these consequences can be dire for your business, if you do not take the trouble to have signed and executed contracts to protect you in your business projects. Can a JCT Building Contract be made even though it is not signed? The answer is, yes it can, but the wisest course of action is always to negotiate and agree a written contract and to make sure it is properly executed. What happens if a contract is not signed? Some of the construction decisions in the Technology and Construction Court illustrate the difficulties the courts face in their investigations of whether a contact has been made, where a signed contract does not exist. A Letter of Intent can ...
This is the third part of a recurring theme for all businesses. What happens if your business does not have a contract in writing? Battle of the Forms - make sure you fax or e mail your terms across It is sometimes difficult to sort out when the contract was made when different terms and conditions are in play. What do the court decisions tell us? A “battle of the forms” decision is Transformers & Rectifiers Limited -v- Needs Limited [2015] EWHC 269 the Technology and Construction Court found that neither party’s terms and conditions applied in circumstances where the Claimant’s terms and conditions were printed on the back of purchase orders and the Defendants’ terms and conditions were referred to in an acknowledgments of order. The TCC Judge Edwards Stuart decided that neither side’s terms and conditions applied because they had not been sufficiently brought to the attention of ...
This is the final article upon the consequences of not having a signed and executed contract in place and how the courts address this problem. A simple contract The courts are willing to find that there has been a contract reached, depending on the facts of the case. The decision of Arcadis Consulting (UK) -v- AMEC (BSC) Limited [2016] EWHC 2509 is another in which the TCC decided that neither party’s terms and conditions were incorporated into the contract after another painstaking exercise by the court in analysing the exchanges by the parties of correspondence and documents that had the appearance of contractual terms and conditions. The court identified a letter that “had all the hallmarks of a letter of intent” and this constituted evidence of “a simple contract”. In addition the court said that performance by the parties “will often make it unrealistic to argue there was no intention ...
Construction companies, you should be vigilant in removing fitness for purpose obligations from your building contracts following the judgment of the Supreme Court that overturned the Court of Appeal decision in MT Hojgaard A/S -v- E.ON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 407 and upheld the decision of Mr Justice Edward Stewart in the Technology and Construction Court, who decided that a “fitness for purpose” obligation was contained in the contract documents and the Contractor was bound by it. C ontractors, top of your list of unacceptable risks should be the “fitness for purpose” obligation, which is an absolute obligation that is not limited to the exercise of the lower standard of reasonable skill and care. The Supreme Court has decided that the Court of Appeal in MT Hojgaard A/S -v- E.ON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Limited was wrong to overturn the ...
Proudly Associated with
